On Saturday, November 20, 2010 5:00:34 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 19/11/2010 18:58 John Baldwin said the following: > > On Friday, November 19, 2010 11:20:04 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> BTW, tq_name doesn't seem to be used anywhere at all. > >> Perhaps just drop it? But still could be useful in a debugger, though. > > > > If it's not used anywhere I would just drop it. > > > > struct taskqueue is defined privately in sys/kern/subr_taskqueue.c and tq_name > is used "write-only" in _taskqueue_create(). > > So, no use for tq_name at all? No. Especially since the structure is private it can always be revived if a use is found for it. You can probably leave the taskqueue_create() API the same for now though. -- John BaldwinReceived on Mon Nov 22 2010 - 13:53:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:09 UTC