Just updated to HEAD and I saw the recent ifconfig, usb ethernet, et all changes: $ ifconfig usbus0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 0 usbus1: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 0 usbus2: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 0 usbus3: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 0 msk0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c011b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE> ether 00:1d:60:b6:eb:97 inet 192.168.20.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.20.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex,flowcontrol,rxpause,txpause>) status: active usbus4: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 0 usbus5: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 0 usbus6: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 0 usbus7: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 0 lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 $ ifconfig -l usbus0 usbus1 usbus2 usbus3 msk0 usbus4 usbus5 usbus6 usbus7 lo0 I don't have any USB ethernet devices, so I would expect usbus, et all to be blank, but this would break a few (dumb) scenarios we have at my work where it goes and looks at ifconfig -l (of course I've tried convincing others to use ifconfig -l inet instead, but that was to no avail). This could potentially break other dumb scripts as well. So the question is: what are we gaining with this additional, terse output? Thanks, -GarrettReceived on Tue Nov 30 2010 - 16:21:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:09 UTC