On 08/27/2010 05:17, pluknet wrote: > On 27 August 2010 00:09, Doug Barton <dougb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> On 08/26/2010 12:53 PM, pluknet wrote: >>> >>> [cc'ing current_at_ as rc_at_ looks too quite] >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Since ifconfig has grown to label interfaces with >>> ifconfig $ifname description "foobar", what about >>> to give it more life and store i/face descriptions >>> semi-permanently, so they will survive between reboots? >>> >>> This patch adds a functionality to rc.d to label >>> interfaces at boot time. >>> >>> Comments are welcome. >> >> This seems like a good addition, thanks. Please also write a patch for >> rc.conf.5 to describe this new functionality and I'll be happy to commit it. > > Xin Li helped me with updating rc.conf.5 (thanks!). > It's included in attached patch. > >> One note below. >> >> >>> --- etc/network.subr (revision 211280) >>> +++ etc/network.subr (working copy) >>> _at__at_ -1187,6 +1187,24 _at__at_ >>> return 0 >>> } >>> >>> +# ifnet_descr >>> +# Add description to all requested interfaces. >>> +# >>> +ifnet_descr() >>> +{ >>> + local _if _ifdescr >>> + >>> + # ifconfig_IF_descr >>> + for _if in `ifconfig -l`; do >>> + _ifdescr="`get_if_var $_if ifconfig_IF_descr`" >>> + if [ ! -z "$_ifdescr" ]; then >> >> This is probably better as [ -n "$_ifdescr" ] >> > > This was blindly copy&pasted after ifnet_rename(). > So, it makes sense probably to change test expression there as well. > [see ifnet_rename() proposed change below inline] > This change to ifnet_rename() is not included in attached patch > to not complicate things unnecessarily for now. > > Index: etc/network.subr > =================================================================== > --- etc/network.subr (revision 211280) > +++ etc/network.subr (working copy) > _at__at_ -1179,7 +1179,7 _at__at_ > # ifconfig_IF_name > for _if in `ifconfig -l`; do > _ifname=`get_if_var $_if ifconfig_IF_name` > - if [ ! -z "$_ifname" ]; then > + if [ -n "$_ifname" ]; then > ifconfig $_if name $_ifname > fi > done Was this ever committed ? If so does anyone have any referring svn revisions ? Also if this is committed or planned to be committed is there a chance it could be MFC'd ? Would be awesome if this was available on a production release without patching ;) Thanks in advance, -- jhell,vReceived on Sun Oct 10 2010 - 01:41:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:08 UTC