On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:56:01PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following: > >>> The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied > >>> either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending > >>> on the desired architecture: > >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff > >> > >> I see that I am not getting as many testers as I expected, so I am going to commit > >> the patch. > >> > >> You still have a short while to either objectively object to the patch or to > >> voluntary test it :-) > > > > I would gladly assist in testing this, except there doesn't appear to be > > an authoritative statement that it will apply to RELENG_8; when I see > > WIP, I assume -CURRENT/HEAD only. > > patch -C is much better than any statement :) > > > Let me know, since all the systems I have are Intel multi-core. > > Yes, the patch should be applicable to stable/8 without any issues. Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both RELENG_8: - Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10) - Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel C2D E6600 (stepping 6) I'll make sure to provide what the topology looks like before and after. Is CPU-relevant dmesg output sufficient? -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc_at_parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |Received on Mon Sep 06 2010 - 11:25:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:07 UTC