Re: {arch}/conf/DEFAULTS and uart

On Thu Sep  9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Sep  9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> > 
> > except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS. is
> > this really necessary? shouldn't DEFAULTS only contain vital devices/options
> > without a kernel on a specific arch won't function at all?
> 
> jhb just explained to me, that the uart entry in DEFAULTS is not a controller
> or something like that, but the uart backend to use *if* uart gets defined in
> the kernel config.
> 
> sorry for the noise folks.

however i found some missing comments and incorrect syntax which i fixed.

see the attached patch.

cheers.
alex

> 
> cheers.
> alex
> 
> > 
> > cheers.
> > alex
> > 
> > -- 
> > a13x
> 
> -- 
> a13x

-- 
a13x