Re: regarding pciids

From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach_at_mailplus.pl>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 04:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Alexander Best-4 wrote:
> 
> any thoughts on using http://pciids.sourceforge.net/ for pciids instead of
> the
> Hart and Boemler lists. the SF site seems to be updated more regularly and
> would get rid of the need to decide for each entry, whether to take the
> Hart or
> Boemler one.
> 
> right now tools/tools/pciid/mk_pci_vendors.pl favours long descriptions
> over
> short ones which means that something like:
> 
> 'Intel(R) ICH9 Family SMBus Controller (8086)'
> 
> will get discarded in favor of
> 
> 'Intel(R) ICH9 Family SMBus Controller working fine with
> http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte (8086)'
> 

+1, since I'm the one[1] with (well, not the only one, ICH9 should be quite
popular) 
"http://download.cnet.com/Chipset-Driver-Inte" device.

best regards, 
- Jakub Lach

[1]
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=748866+0+archive/2010/freebsd-stable/20100912.freebsd-stable
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/regarding-pciids-tp29704378p29707595.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Tue Sep 14 2010 - 09:48:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:07 UTC