On 14.09.2010 18:08, Fabien Thomas wrote: > > On 14 sept. 2010, at 17:41, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> On 14.09.2010 11:18, Fabien Thomas wrote: >>> Great, >>> >>> This will maybe kill the long time debate about "my loopback is slow vs linux" >>> To have the best of both world what about a socket option to enable/disable fusing: >>> can be useful when you need to see some connection "packetized". >> >> A sysctl to that effect is already in the patch. > yes, i'm just wondering on a per connection setting. I've devised a way to prevent socket fusing when bpf is enabled on the interface the loopback came from. So I'm leaning against adding another obscure and non-portable socket option. -- AndreReceived on Tue Sep 14 2010 - 14:22:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:07 UTC