On Monday, September 20, 2010 10:06:53 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 20 September 2010 21:25, John Baldwin <jhb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Why not include this iff both 'device ath' and 'device pci' are included? > > That is what is normally done for bus-specific attachments. > > I've not idea right now whether there's an Atheros SoC with an > AHB-attached wireless device and a PCI bus. In fact, that won't work > at the present time because the device names would clash. Why would the device names clash? We have _lots_ of drivers with multiple bus attachments that use the same name regardless of which bus they are on, and making a bus attachment conditional on the bus being present is what every other driver that desires this level of granularity does. -- John BaldwinReceived on Tue Sep 21 2010 - 11:35:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:07 UTC