On Wednesday 29 September 2010 15:14:08 John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 7:37:15 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 29/09/2010 13:40 Alexander Motin said the following: > > > Hi. > > > > > > David Naylor wrote: > > >> Trying to boot a recent (sep 23) amd64 kernel in safe-mode fails with > > >> ``panic: No usable event timer found!''. This occurs on two (all my) > > >> machines. This has been a persistent problem since the introduction > > >> of the event timer code. > > > > > > I've reproduced the problem. > > > > > > The reason is that all (or at least most) of devices (both PCI and > > > ISA), including only available in that mode i8254 and RTC timers, > > > failed to allocate their interrupts. While reported message is indeed > > > related to event timer code, problem IMHO doesn't. While without this > > > panic system could boot without any alive timer, I have doubts that it > > > would be functional without timers, USB, network and disk controllers. > > > > > > Problems seems to be the same if I am trying to boot without ACPI. > > Probably the kernel doesn't have 'device atpic' so disabling APIC probably > breaks all interrupts. A newer system might only describe APICs via the > ACPI MADT table and not provide an MP Table. In that case disabling ACPI > would effectively disable APIC leading to the same result. Is APIC and ACPI disabled in safe-mode on amd64? This is using GENERIC, perhaps atpic should be added to the config file, or made mandatory for amd64 systems? > > It's interesting to see what the "Safe Mode" really is: > > dup bootsafekey _at_ = if > > > > s" arch-i386" environment? if > > > > drop > > s" acpi_load" unsetenv > > s" 1" s" hint.acpi.0.disabled" setenv > > s" 1" s" loader.acpi_disabled_by_user" setenv > > s" 1" s" hint.apic.0.disabled" setenv > > > > then > > s" 0" s" hw.ata.ata_dma" setenv > > s" 0" s" hw.ata.atapi_dma" setenv > > s" 0" s" hw.ata.wc" setenv > > s" 0" s" hw.eisa_slots" setenv > > s" 1" s" hint.kbdmux.0.disabled" setenv > > 0 boot > > > > Not sure if disabling ACPI on modern hardware is a good idea. > > Even more unsure about disabling APIC. > > > > Makes me wonder what this could be useful for. > > Perhaps, these are just leftovers from times were ACPI, APIC (and ATA > > DMA) were all new and unproven things. > > Yes, on modern machines I think disabling ACPI and APIC is less safe > actually.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:07 UTC