On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 04:11:27PM +0400, Sergey Vinogradov wrote: >Hi, >I've written a tiny-tiny patch, which adds the '-t' flag to >ifconfig(8). It modifies the output to display IPv4 netmasks in dotted >decimal notation: > Sorry but as much as I would like to see this happen and change the display of the netmask I just cannot seem to come to a genuine consensus that justifies adding a '-t' flag or any flag for that matter just to modify the output of one field in the display of ifconfig(8) In general flags to programs usually should carry some sort of meaning to what they are meant to do and I dont really see that for '-t' and netmask display. What I feel would be a better approach to this is checking the environ(7) for some sort of variable that can be specified on a per-user basis or the system as a whole. As to what that variable would be called I could only suggest in a naming convention to be ``HUMANIZE'' or something similiar and then ifconfig(8) could be the first consumer of that variable and probably shortly following du(1) & df(1). This variable could also be one that acts as BLOCKSIZE does to df(1) output and also be available for consumption by other utilities that may need fine tuning without breaking existing interfaces. </STRONG-OPINION> -- Regards, J. Hellenthal
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC