RFC: let man(1) depend on users PATH?

From: Ulrich Spörlein <uqs_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:01:37 +0200
Greetings,

the following patch is required to let man(1) continue to work if the
user build WITHOUT_GROFF and has textproc/groff installed. I personally
think relying on a sane $PATH while calling groff and co is ok to do.

If there are good reasons against this, please speak your mind. The idea
is to be able to switch back and forth between base/ports groff-suite
without having to alter any configuration files.

Cheers,
Uli

Received on Mon Apr 18 2011 - 18:01:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC