On 2011/04/20 00:53, Ryan Stone wrote: > In r179417 the implementation of pthread_once in libthr was changed > from using a global pthread_mutex_t for synchronization to rolling its > own synchronization mechanism. Unfortunately, this introduced a bug. > Calling _pthread_mutex_lock implicitly ensured that _thr_check_init() > had been called. In the current version, there is no such guarantee. > This means that if your first call into libthr is pthread_once, your > executable will segfault when it tries to access curthread. This > patch resolves the issue for me: > > Index: lib/libthr/thread/thr_once.c > =================================================================== > --- lib/libthr/thread/thr_once.c (revision 220603) > +++ lib/libthr/thread/thr_once.c (working copy) > _at__at_ -64,6 +64,8 _at__at_ > struct pthread *curthread; > int state; > > + _thr_check_init(); > + > for (;;) { > state = once_control->state; > if (state == ONCE_DONE) > > If there are no objections I'll commit this soon. Have you tested that current code causes segfault ? anyway, I can not reproduce it on my machne. Regards, David XuReceived on Wed Apr 20 2011 - 00:13:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC