Re: nspluginwrapper (was: Re: Wow... (<-- blown away at performance))

From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:12:45 -0400
On Saturday 23 April 2011 04:11 pm, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> On Thursday 31 March 2011 02:27 pm, Alexander Best wrote:
> >>> i just noticed the WWW links in pkg-descr of boths
> >>> nspluginwrapper and nspluginwrapper-devel are broken. i believe
> >>> [1] is the current location.
> >>>
> >>> cheers.
> >>> alex
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://github.com/davidben/nspluginwrapper
> >>
> >> No, this is actually a fork.  The original author disappeared
> >> and this guy picked it up from the last snapshot release. 
> >> Please note there was no official release from this tree yet. 
> >> If this guy actually produces something useful,
> >> www/nspluginwrapper-devel may switch later, of course.
> >
> > Yes, this is a fork, but he is serious about cleaning up the code
> > and is planning to become the new upstream.  He was actually just
> > in the office here this afternoon commenting how introducing a
> > feature to configure that causes unknown options to be errors
> > would cause most distros' packaging to break. Please do continue
> > to follow it, as I expect it will come to fruition.
>
> Replying to this old thread, David tells me he has rolled a
> release, and has gained the old maintainer's blessing:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/nspluginwrapper-devel-list/2011-Apri
>l/msg00006.html
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/nspluginwrapper-devel-list/2011-Apri
>l/msg00003.html

www/nspluginwrapper-devel is updated to 1.3.2.

Cheers,

Jung-uk Kim
Received on Tue Apr 26 2011 - 17:12:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC