Quoting David Schultz <das_at_FreeBSD.ORG> (from Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:46:45 -0400): > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Hi, >> I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok >> with the removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places. >> The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to >> fix it for many years. This seems to indicate that the interest in >> ICC is low. >> If there's anyone against this, speak now or forever be silent. :-) > > For what it's worth, I still occasionally use icc for simple > tasks-- mainly as a reference for code generation, since it > produces reasonable output in many cases where gcc does not. > As I recall, making it work required minimal changes... possibly > just making sure __va_list gets defined in _types.h. I have > the following in one of my trees, although this is obviously > not the right fix. It depends if you want to hide the problem on all other compilers or not. I would prefer to not hide the problem. Bye, Alexander. -- Volley Theory: It is better to have lobbed and lost than never to have lobbed at all. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild _at_ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137Received on Thu Apr 28 2011 - 11:43:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC