Hi Slawa! Thanks for the links! That's great links! about russian, there is no problem... google translate :) thanks, Victor On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My > > server configuration is: > > > > Dell 1950 > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5130 _at_ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz > K8-class > > CPU) > > 4 x CPU > > 2 NIC (<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T) > > 1 NIC (em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.1.9>) > > > > I want to reach the high processing of packets per second and use pf as > > synproxy and we still processor to handle others packets or flows. > > > > I know that em drivers has MULTI_QUEUE implementation that helps high > > performance for Intel drivers, but I couldn't see more information about. > We > > can reached 500k pps, but no more traffic was processed by this > interface. > > > > I've already enabled net.isr.direct but with Intel Drivers does not work > and > > the most processors are in System instead of Interrupts, why? When I > enable > > net.isr.direct the processing is balanced for on CPU in system and > another > > in interrupt and I reached 1M pps, but the total perfomance is down, the > > load grow up too fast. > > > > I've changed some parameter in sysctl for intel drivers, but it doesn't > have > > effect. > > > > Someone know what I can do to reach more packets performance? I want to > use > > this FreeBSD as a router/firewall only. > > FreeBSD (and em) need some tuning for high perfomance. > > Next links in russian, sorry. > > http://dadv.livejournal.com/138951.html > http://dadv.livejournal.com/139170.html > http://dadv.livejournal.com/139366.html > > -- > Slawa Olhovchenkov >Received on Mon Aug 08 2011 - 14:21:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:16 UTC