Steve Wills wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/27/11 21:23, Steve Wills wrote: > > On 08/27/11 20:55, Rick Macklem wrote: > >>> I don't know why the nfsd wouldn't be able to bind(2) to port > >>> #2049 a > >>> second time for UDP, but someone on the net side might know? (Just > >>> in > >>> case it is a problem that has already been fixed, I'd try a newer > >>> kernel.) > > > > Will do, see below. > > > >>> The new server was broken by r224778 on Aug. 11 and fixed by > >>> r224911 on > >>> Aug. 16. (I recall you mentioning Aug. 11?) > > > > My kernel is from Aug 13, so definitely would fall into that range. > > I'll > > update and rebuild and see how it goes. > > > > After working around the /dev/stdout issue by booting an old kernel > and > doing a buildworld from there, I was able to update my kernel to > todays > sources. ESXi is now able to mount the nfs share. However, when I > attempt to start a VM, it reports: > > Failed to power on VM. > Unable to retrieve the current working directory: 0 (Input/output > error). Check if the directory has been deleted or unmounted. > > and > > FILE: File_Cwd: getcwd() failed: Input/output error > > I have tcpdump output available here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~swills/nfs2.pcap > > if that helps. > I think it did. Lookup of ".." was failing. I think that was because ni_strictrelative (added for capabilities) wasn't initialized and happened to be non-zero. Please try this patch and let us know if it helps: --- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c.sav 2011-08-29 11:05:00.000000000 -0400 +++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c 2011-08-29 11:29:43.000000000 -0400 _at__at_ -282,6 +282,10 _at__at_ nfsvno_namei(struct nfsrv_descript *nd, *retdirp = NULL; cnp->cn_nameptr = cnp->cn_pnbuf; + /* Initialize new fields for capabilities. */ + ndp->ni_strictrelative = 0; + ndp->ni_rightsneeded = 0; + ndp->ni_baserights = 0; /* * Extract and set starting directory. */ It's also at (in case white space gets munged) http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/dotdot.patch Thanks for reporting this, I'm not sure when these fields not being initialized would have been noticed otherwise, rick > Steve > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOWzShAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhxo0H/0ALErvMrpcxtkuUv07ipj0O > Z8p3YkMFkckSy6s0QCAOCVgjbqZptCkKg96vMehG3nI5o2HtA43h5y6UNvMi1FWE > WOiIFbzXkgfn1pubv2YyFwaDK1aFXMswwYaCHSP7a+K8fpjDOiR5ZnhhyXcb7k1X > YmURkSEbLbngLdIfywPATSiby9PyFVqyMjhU3yW/Y8QLueEjK4xq5RsbmU1Qmv2B > bjA11x9birNvc//iBp6zTqBP752soqK+M9aXrjjm9GzhN0UeKdXseWt9zd3mu2qs > cfPUqz7DSATQNxwfpqIGnE4naYzPyKPbDbv6k5lKDjmmHn2O7VzXQXimjE6sT3o= > =Dpjc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Mon Aug 29 2011 - 13:47:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC