On 30 August 2011 13:13, Hartmann, O. <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 08/30/11 09:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> >> On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >>> >>> 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>> >>>> This website should be brushed up or taken offline! >>>> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. >>>> >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html >>> >>> I think this one would better look like list of major features with os >>> comparison, like: >>> >>> = Networking = >>> * IPv6: major support, best stack around. >>> * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. >>> ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet). >>> >>> = Data storage = >>> * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux >>> has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has >>> dynamic disks since XP (?features). >>> >>> = SMP = >>> * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some >>> rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like >>> DragonflyBSD and QNX). >>> >> And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems >> which >> those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention. >> >> --HPS >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > What's about DTrace? > > = Development/System Profiling = > * DTrace: Some notes of the Kernel Gurus what this could mean for > performance profiling and development > > = Licensing Model = > * Some striking comments on the advantage for companies or interested > people of the BSD-like licensing model over the GPLv3 on which Linux is > based now and which has serious implications for those who wants to develop > and sell software developed on/with GNU stuff. it would be very honest, if > we do not only emphasize only the pros. BSD came from the academic > environment, that was where I met it the first time and I appreciated the > way things were developed and 'sloppyness' was a nogo. So we should keep it > up and a serious and honest set of contraru points for all compared OS > should be appreciable. > > > Does the VM of FreeBSD still have advantges (measurable) over Linux? [Taking random email.] I think we could merge the $subj web page with this one (which is more actual, as of 7.0): http://www.freebsd.org/features.html -- wbr, pluknetReceived on Tue Aug 30 2011 - 07:23:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC