on 30/08/2011 16:45 Paul Ambrose said the following: > I do not believe the current status of DTrace is appropriate for promoting > > 1. DTrace is an experimental function or Semi-finished products. The kernel > dtrace support is ok, but the userland support is far from completion(at > least the pid provider has many bugs) > > 2 the FreeBSD implementation is different from Solaris/Mac OS X. The > DTraceToolkit, which has many amazing feature, can not 100% works on > FreeBSD, and there is no doc to identify the difference. > > 3 There is a missing feature list about DTrace, but no schedule list about > when to fix it. 4. There is a missing developer/maintainer for DTrace on FreeBSD. Nevertheless the kernel DTrace is quite usable and useful for kernel debugging. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Tue Aug 30 2011 - 13:39:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:17 UTC