Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov <max_at_mxcrypt.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov
> > <pluknet_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current_at_dino.sk>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source
> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying
> >>> what to csup
> >>>
> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
> >>>
> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just
> >>>
> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
> >>>
> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config
> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two
> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to
> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older
> >>> version sources.
> >>>
> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make
> >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version...
> >>>
> >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I
> >>> think this line should already be changed to new tag...
> >>>
> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9
> >>
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Fixed. Thanks for your report.
> >> Now cvs tag points to RELENG_9 in 9.x sources.
> >
> > Should standard-supfile also be updated to point to RELENG_9_0? I'm
> > using csup with "tag=RELENG_9_0" and standard-supfile still points
> > to HEAD.
> 
> Yep, sure.
> I just sent a request to the Release Engineering Team.
> 

It works for me now as expected, thanks.

Anyway, there is a question what the difference between stable-supfile
and standard-supfile should be. I looked in my local csupped sources,
they are the same in 6-STABLE (OK, some history here), 7-STABLE,
8-STABLE and 9-STABLE. Are they expected to be used differently?

And, second one - what about CURRENT? In stable-supfile I see
tag=RELENG_9 which is not quite clear, but just for some pedantry... I
use standard-supfile for CURRENT, so this is not an issue for me either.

Regards,
Milan