Re: CVS removal from the base

From: Chris Rees <crees_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:19:50 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
On 11/12/2011 14:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:03 PM, <sthaug_at_nethelp.no> wrote:
>>
>>> I use CVS (or rather csup) to keep the base system up to date.
>>> I would be perfectly okay with using a different utility -
>>> however, I would strongly prefer that this utility was included
>>> in the base system.
>>
>> CVS != csup.
>>
>> I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS
>> when they really mean cvsup/csup.
>>
>> Max
>
> I use CVS I've used sup, (maybe csup can't rememeber, not used
> cvsup really) I avoid reliance on a net connection just to do a
> checkout. I use ctm to [push] feed my local CVS tree. ctm deltas of
> cvs src & ports are generated [by cvsup, pulling from freebsd.org]
> elsewhere, ctm-users_at_freebsd.org led by Stephen M recently
> included: Subject: ctm for svn

csup will work fine with a local cvs tree and is much (much much)
faster than cvs for a sparse checkout.

Just run cvsupd locally (does require net/cvsup installed).

Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO5OY2AAoJELCEktHh68rEfMYIALDLqMQna7Vkphzk7qVoAIy9
N7iSNoSjS2mrXs841G1k5bxlfyEUN/whAuO3N7PxqXVZ5zTaoNycSSZUsGRNUK+p
oFOvy1R7Zsf791++eHUpGk7VYVZeGr5vGwMrM7MyrfLbDawRxp9DGVMJpElGyqBH
iMZxq2jZ/HsRxPi8wtuDHuewQX6f+MZg8yODsuio+aReGjwmjPZMTcStt14DfoEi
AajHbbdLqMoVEa02N46JcPjDlgWkQ9x0g9cbIxzMoLGIRI7PAmq2sEVNlNIIZYxA
vgNQq+qF7D10pg03WpwA54EglWaFhZDk3kYuk57oW94Iayr79PRdKst8wEQVe+4=
=ZGlO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sun Dec 11 2011 - 16:20:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:21 UTC