On 15 Dec 2011 21:25, "Kevin Oberman" <kob6558_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees <crees_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it > >> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive > >> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS. > >> > > > > > > Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity? > > > > You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the > > point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons. > > > > A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates. > > Wouldn't UFS+SUJ be the closest atch? Yup. Thanks. ChrisReceived on Thu Dec 15 2011 - 20:50:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:22 UTC