Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann > <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today: >> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA >> > it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is > using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, it still manages to > out-perform the bleeding edge FreeBSD :-) > serenity# gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] serenity# uname -r 9.0-RC3 > Now, from what I've read so far in this thread, it seems that a lot of > people are still in abnegation... > > my 0.2c, > - Arnaud > >> It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts of >> the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simply far beyond >> disapointing, it is more than inacceptable and by just reading those >> benchmarks, I'd like to drop thinking of using FreeBSD even as a backend >> server in scientific and business environments. In detail, some of the >> SciMark benches look disappointing. The overall image can't help over >> the fact that in C-Ray FreeBSD is better performing. >> >> From the compiler, I'd like say there couldn't be a drop of more than 10 >> - 15% in performance - but not 10 or 100 times. >> >> I'm just thinking about the discussion of SCHED_ULE and all the saur >> spots we discussed when I stumbled over the test. >> >> Regards, >> Oliver >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Fri Dec 16 2011 - 05:55:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:22 UTC