On 12/15/2011 08:26 AM, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > 15.12.2011 17:36, Michael Larabel пишет: >> On 12/15/2011 07:25 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: >>> Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel: >>>> No, the same hardware was used for each OS. >>>> >>>> In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was >>>> used. >>> Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with >>> journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is more >>> similar >>> in concept to ext4 and since that is what most FreeBSD users will use >>> with FreeBSD? >> >> I was running some ZFS vs. UFS tests as well and this happened to have >> ZFS on when I was running some other tests. >> > > Can we look at the tests? > My opinion is ZFS without tuning is much slower than UFS2. > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNjgReceived on Thu Dec 15 2011 - 13:28:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:22 UTC