Why does kern.module_path use ";" and not ":"?

From: Stefan Bethke <stb_at_lassitu.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 15:55:26 +0100

I just got tripped up by this difference in a minor way.  Is there a particular reason kern_linker uses semicolon as a seperator instead of the more common colon?


Stefan

-- 
Stefan Bethke <stb_at_lassitu.de>   Fon +49 151 14070811

Received on Sun Dec 25 2011 - 13:55:28 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bruce Evans: "Re: [rfc] removing -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 flag for i386?"
Previous message: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc"
Next in thread: C. P. Ghost: "Re: Why does kern.module_path use ";" and not ":"?"
Reply: C. P. Ghost: "Re: Why does kern.module_path use ";" and not ":"?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:22 UTC