Re: [rfc] removing/conditionalising WERROR= in Makefiles

From: Philip Paeps <philip_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:04:49 +0100
On 2011-12-26 10:10:40 (+0000), Alexander Best <arundel_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> i grep'ed through src/sys and found several places where WERROR= was set in
> order to get rid of the default -Werror setting. i tried to remove those
> WERROR= overrides from any Makefile, where doing so did not break tinderbox.
> 
> in those cases, where it couldn't be completely removed, i added conditions to
> only set WERROR= for the particular achitecture or compiler, where tinderbox
> did not suceed without the WERROR=.

Wouldn't it be better to set WARNS=x rather than WERROR=?  WERROR= says "this
code has bugs, it breaks tinderbox" whereas WARNS=x says "this code has the
following kind of bugs which break tinderbox".

Possibly wrapped in an architecture-test where appropriate.

 - Philip

-- 
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
Received on Tue Dec 27 2011 - 09:42:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:22 UTC