On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 22:02:11 +0100 Ulrich Spörlein <uqs_at_spoerlein.net> wrote: > On Wed, 02.02.2011 at 12:04:58 -0800, Xin LI wrote: > > On 02/02/11 11:54, Alexander Best wrote: > > > so far dd(1) with a bs=2048 finished after: > > > > > > 4676648960 bytes transferred in 1639.108763 secs (2853166 bytes/sec) > > > > Just curious - how will recoverdisk(1) perform? I haven't tried it > > myself but it uses much larger window which could be faster. > > +1 for recoverdisk. I hacked it so that it will also cope with media > that has weird sectorsizes like 2352 bytes. It is awesome for reading > optical media now, thanks to retries, large read requests and the > ability to save progress (so you can try the failing sectors in another > drive). > And are these hacks available to the general public somewhere? -- Gary Jennejohn (gj_at_)Received on Thu Feb 03 2011 - 10:07:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:11 UTC