Rich <rincebrain_at_gmail.com> writes: >> Attempted this procedure today, make fails with: [...] >> /usr/local/ncvs/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/arc.c:188: >> error: 'zfs_mdcomp_disable' undeclared here (not in a function) > > First error is just a variable undefined that was defined in the original > file pre-patching in the function; redefined it as defined in the original. No, it should be removed from there. See if you have arc.c.rej. %% _at__at_ -186,14 +185,11 _at__at_ TUNABLE_QUAD("vfs.zfs.arc_max", &zfs_arc_max); TUNABLE_QUAD("vfs.zfs.arc_min", &zfs_arc_min); TUNABLE_QUAD("vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit", &zfs_arc_meta_limit); -TUNABLE_INT("vfs.zfs.mdcomp_disable", &zfs_mdcomp_disable); SYSCTL_DECL(_vfs_zfs); SYSCTL_UQUAD(_vfs_zfs, OID_AUTO, arc_max, CTLFLAG_RDTUN, &zfs_arc_max, 0, "Maximum ARC size"); SYSCTL_UQUAD(_vfs_zfs, OID_AUTO, arc_min, CTLFLAG_RDTUN, &zfs_arc_min, 0, "Minimum ARC size"); -SYSCTL_INT(_vfs_zfs, OID_AUTO, mdcomp_disable, CTLFLAG_RDTUN, - &zfs_mdcomp_disable, 0, "Disable metadata compression"); /* * Note that buffers can be in one of 6 states: %% >> /usr/local/ncvs/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/arc.c:3580: >> warning: passing argument 7 of 'zio_write' discards qualifiers from pointer target type > > Second error is because arc_write takes a const of that property now, and > zio_write still doesn't, resulting in the warning as shown. Dunno what the > correct way to fix this is, as it's unclear to me why the change was done. Did you count wrong? The 7th argument to zio_write() around 3580 line is `&zp' vs. `zp'. %% _at__at_ -3563,8 +3573,7 _at__at_ callback->awcb_private = private; callback->awcb_buf = buf; - write_policy(spa, wp, &zp); - zio = zio_write(pio, spa, txg, bp, buf->b_data, hdr->b_size, &zp, + zio = zio_write(pio, spa, txg, bp, buf->b_data, hdr->b_size, zp, arc_write_ready, arc_write_done, callback, priority, zio_flags, zb); return (zio); %% > This looks more broken than I might hope to fix trivially, since working > around the second one above results in more brokenness in dbuf.c. I suppose > I'll wait for an updated patchset to try this out again.Received on Mon Feb 07 2011 - 01:54:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:11 UTC