So it's all completely stable for you too right now? adrian 2011/1/22 Dima Panov <fluffy_at_fluffy.khv.ru>: > Hello! > > 22.01.2011, 13:56, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd_at_gmail.com>: >> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd_at_gmail.com>; wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the >>> if_ath code into -HEAD. >> >> Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in >> all the code was just shuffled around a bit. >> >> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd >> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets >> would test this out and get back to me. > > FreeBSD 9.0-900030-CURRENT #0 r217695M: Sat Jan 22 13:57:57 VLAT 2011 > ath0: <Atheros 9285> mem 0xf0000000-0xf000ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci9 > ath0: AR9285 mac 192.2 RF5133 phy 14.0 > > Signal strength is fine, no packets loss. > ath 9285 was stable for me last months. > Acer Ferrari One 200 laptop with half-sized atheros wifi card. > >> I'd like to make sure I fix all regressions before I start bringing >> over more code from ath9k in preparation for enabling the basic >> 802.11n support for testing. > > -- > Dima Panov (fluffy_at_FreeBSD.org) > KDE_at_FreeBSD team > > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=100000181104157 >Received on Sat Jan 22 2011 - 11:19:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:10 UTC