Re: More if_ath churn coming your way!

From: b. f. <bf1783_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:11:02 +0000
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 2011/1/22 Dima Panov <fluffy at fluffy.khv.ru>:
>
> > 22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>:

> This is why I really do need this tested as much as possible. I'll put
> up instructions on how to build if_ath as a module (that's what I'm
> doing on my RELENG_8 EEEPC - I'm running the HEAD if_ath on it for
> testing on the AR9280) and then sort out any and all issues on the
> AR5416, AR9160, AR9280 and AR9285.
>
> Throwing 11n into the mix right now is just a bit too much for me to take on. :)

Would you look to see if any of your improvements can also be used by uath(4)?

b.
Received on Sat Jan 22 2011 - 16:11:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:10 UTC