Re: why panic(9) ?

From: Anonymous <swell.k_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:13:31 +0300

David Demelier <demelier.david_at_gmail.com> writes:

> In any case, when panic occurs, switching display to the tty can be
> great. Why not a sysctl like kern.tty_on_panic? Because when you're
> running X and a panic occurs not everybody understand what happens.

IIRC, it requires KMS support.

Received on Sun Jan 23 2011 - 22:13:40 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc"
Previous message: Garrett Cooper: "Re: why panic(9) ?"
In reply to: David Demelier: "Re: why panic(9) ?"
Next in thread: Doug Barton: "Re: why panic(9) ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:10 UTC