On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 08:05:56PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>Should the bit slice be 7 or 8 bits ? > > >I propose to go 8 bits, and add the check to be future-proof. > > >It seems that we already parse GNU/kFreeBSD brandnote. I think this > >could be used to distinguish between old behaviour, that is currently > >used by your libc, and proposed new interface, if __FreeBSD_version > >is bumped and honored by glibc. You might need to store the brandinfo > >somewhere in struct proc or use the separate struct sysentvec. > > No, the version in brandnote is compile-time minimal supported version, > we will detect at runtime (by "sysctl kern.osreldate") which interface we > should use. > > > So far defined rfork() options: > > /* > * XXX currently, some operations without RFPROC set are not supported. > */ > > #define RFNAMEG (1<<0) /* UNIMPL new plan9 `name space' */ > #define RFENVG (1<<1) /* UNIMPL copy plan9 `env space' */ > #define RFFDG (1<<2) /* copy fd table */ > #define RFNOTEG (1<<3) /* UNIMPL create new plan9 `note > group' */ > #define RFPROC (1<<4) /* change child (else changes > curproc) */ > #define RFMEM (1<<5) /* share `address space' */ > #define RFNOWAIT (1<<6) /* give child to init */ > #define RFCNAMEG (1<<10) /* UNIMPL zero plan9 `name space' */ > #define RFCENVG (1<<11) /* UNIMPL zero plan9 `env space' */ > #define RFCFDG (1<<12) /* close all fds, zero fd table */ > #define RFTHREAD (1<<13) /* enable kernel thread support */ > #define RFSIGSHARE (1<<14) /* share signal handlers */ > #define RFLINUXTHPN (1<<16) /* do linux clone exit parent > notification */ > #define RFSTOPPED (1<<17) /* leave child in a stopped state */ > #define RFHIGHPID (1<<18) /* use a pid higher than 10 > (idleproc) */ > #define RFPPWAIT (1<<31) /* parent sleeps until child exits > (vfork) */ > #define RFKERNELONLY (RFSTOPPED | RFHIGHPID | RFPPWAIT) > > > The new interface will add: > > #define RFTSIGZMB (1<<19) > #define RFTSIGSHIFT 20 /* reserve bits 20-27 */ > #define RFTSIGMASK 0xFF > #define RFTSIGNUM(flags) (((flags) >> RFTSIGSHIFT) & RFTSIGMASK) > #define RFTSIGFLAGS(signum) ((signum) << RFTSIGSHIFT) > > Seems this interface be acceptable ? Looks good to me.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC