Dňa 30. 7. 2011 17:29, Alexander Leidinger wrote / napísal(a): > On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:11:37 +0200 Martin Matuska <mm_at_FreeBSD.org> > wrote: > > >> The attached patch allows better fine-tuning of jails started via >> /etc/rc.d, uses the new jail(8) flags (-c -m), the persist parameter >> and adds ZFS support. >> Patch is fully backward compatible. >> >> Please review, comment and/or test my attached patch. > Can you please have a look at the jail part of > http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/current-patches/etc:rc.d.diff and take > some parts which you didn't take care about > (jailname/securelevel/correctness check for fstab entries)? > > Bye, > Alexander. > I have added the check for fstab entries to my patch. The jailname/securelevel part is questionable. As to discussion with Jamie Gritton (jamie_at_) we should go the jail_example_params way for as many parameters as possible so we don't unnecessarily pollute rc.conf. This is not possible for persist because it has to be set to 1 on creation time for ZFS support. This way a user can set something like: jail_example_params="name=test securelevel=1 enforce_statfs=1 allow.mount=1" Patch available at: http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/jail/jail_etc.patch -- Martin Matuska FreeBSD committer http://blog.vx.skReceived on Sun Jul 31 2011 - 18:49:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:16 UTC