On 01/06/2011 20:21, Attilio Rao wrote: > Current maximum number of CPUs supported by the FreeBSD kernel is 32. > That number cames from indirectly by the fact that we have a cpumask_t > type, representing a mask of CPUs, which is an unsigned int right now. > I then made a patch that removes the cpumask_t type and uses cpuset_t > type for characterizing a generic mask of CPUs: > http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/largeSMP/largeSMP-patchset-beta-0.diff Hi, I'm just wandering: what is the expected overhead of this, compared to using a simple atomic integer (32-bit on i386, 64-bit on amd64)? I assume that this will introduce more work, like locking, in performance-critical code like the scheduler, etc.?Received on Thu Jun 02 2011 - 10:23:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:14 UTC