2011/6/9 Michael Butler <imb_at_protected-networks.net>: > On 06/09/11 17:18, Attilio Rao wrote: >> 2011/6/9 Mark Linimon <linimon_at_lonesome.com>: >>> Things that change the way the base system behaves w/rt ports need >>> version bumps. >> >> BTW, could someone provide an actual error message? >> >> I assume these errors are caused by cpumask_t going away. > > For emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod .. > > cc -O2 -pipe -march=prescott -DRT_OS_FREEBSD -DIN_RING0 -DIN_RT_R0 > -DIN_SUP_R0 -DVBOX -DRT_WITH_VBOX -w -DVBOX_WITH_HARDENING > -DVBOX_WITH_64_BITS_GUESTS -DRT_ARCH_X86 -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror > -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -Iinclude -I. -Ir0drv -I. -I_at_ > -I_at_/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 > --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-sse -mno-mmx -msoft-float > -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -std=iso9899:1999 -fstack-protector > -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef > -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs > -fdiagnostics-show-option -c > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.0.8_OSE/out/freebsd.x86/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/mp-r0drv-freebsd.c > > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.0.8_OSE/out/freebsd.x86/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/mp-r0drv-freebsd.c: > In function 'RTMpOnOthers': > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.0.8_OSE/out/freebsd.x86/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/mp-r0drv-freebsd.c:167: > error: 'cpumask_t' undeclared (first use in this function) > > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.0.8_OSE/out/freebsd.x86/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/mp-r0drv-freebsd.c:167: > error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.0.8_OSE/out/freebsd.x86/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/mp-r0drv-freebsd.c:167: > error: for each function it appears in.) > > Without a version bump, it becomes impossible to determine if a > version-specific patch can be applied to accommodate the ABI change, Well, the ports should be working against -CURRENT, so what you say is not entirely true. Second thing, yeah, it is cpumask_t going away, so someone needs to sit there, check what usage of cpumask_t was done and replace with proper code. It seems usual port maintenance due by the maintainer IMHO. I'm not entirely sure how bumping __FreeBSD_version may help right now. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Thu Jun 09 2011 - 20:26:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:14 UTC