Hi, I found a possible issue with SU+J on recent versions of -CURRENT. After deleting a large file hierarchy (copy of /usr/src, ~1.5 Gbyte), df reports a negative number of blocks "Used" for a while. I am using a GENERIC kernel (r223184) on an amd64 platform. The hardware is relatively simple: Intel DP965LT mainboard with a Q6600 CPU, 8 Gbyte RAM and two Samsung 501LJ 500 Gbyte SATA disks. The issue can be demonstrated by copying /usr/src to the current directory (cp -R /usr/src .) and running the following script to delete the copy and print the free space at 10 second intervals: #!/bin/sh df . time rm -rf src echo 'src is gone ...' while true do df . | tail -1 sleep 10 done This yields the following output: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 1612066 381241242 0% /home 51.21 real 1.00 user 17.38 sys src is gone ... /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 -164692 383018000 -0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 -165082 383018390 -0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 -246852 383100160 -0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 -246852 383100160 -0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 -246852 383100160 -0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 -64146 382917454 -0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 -64146 382917454 -0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 -64146 382917454 -0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 32910 382820398 0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 32910 382820398 0% /home So it takes more than a minute before the disk space is back to "normal" values. After disabling journaling (tunefs -j disable) I get the following output: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 1579284 381274024 0% /home 35.40 real 0.96 user 13.32 sys src is gone ... /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 128 382853180 0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 128 382853180 0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 128 382853180 0% /home /dev/ada0s1g 416144900 128 382853180 0% /home which is as it should be. The problem also does not occur with journaling enabled when I revert to r222723. Is anybody else seeing these weird phenomena? Could this be related to the recent changes to UFS? Kind regards, Hans OttevangerReceived on Fri Jun 17 2011 - 13:53:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC