I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64 system. On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David O'Brien wrote: > Does anyone object to this patch? > > David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two > years with no problems. > > I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on > TMPFS either. > > > Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c > =================================================================== > --- tmpfs_vfsops.c (revision 221113) > +++ tmpfs_vfsops.c (working copy) > _at__at_ -155,9 +155,6 _at__at_ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp) > return EOPNOTSUPP; > } > > - printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental " > - "feature in FreeBSD.\n"); > - > vn_lock(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY); > error = VOP_GETATTR(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, &va, mp->mnt_cred); > VOP_UNLOCK(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, 0); > > -- > -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Thu Jun 23 2011 - 15:40:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC