On 06/25/11 10:10, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> Hello. >> Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other binutils >> from LLVM and was wondering why they are contained in the port's llvm >> collection but not in FreeBSD's source contribution. > > There's no use for these utilities in FreeBSD base system. > >> I build FreeBSD 9 with CLANG. But as a missing llvm-as and llvm-ld (or >> llvm-ar) would imply, the binaries are generated via binutils from >> theGNU suite, aren't they? > llvm-{as,ld,ar} are not replacements for those from binutils. llvm-* > work on the llvm bitcode only and are of no use for normal object > files. > > dim_at_ made a patch that adds those utilities if you really need them > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2011-June/000216.html > > By default when you compile things with clang it uses its own assembler > (ie. it goes directly from C -> .o) so typically only gnu ld is used > in the compilation chain. > > > roman Thank you very much. Patched and works. OliverReceived on Sat Jun 25 2011 - 13:53:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC