On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Eric McCorkle wrote: > >> make.conf: >> CPUTYPE?=core2 >> .if !defined(CC) || ${CC} == "cc" >> CC=clang >> CFLAGS=-Qunused-arguments >> .endif >> .if !defined(CXX) || ${CXX} == "c++" >> CXX=clang++ >> .endif >> NO_WERROR= >> WERROR= >> NO_FSCHG= >> PERL_VERSION=5.12.3 >> >> Just noticed, the CFLAGS would disable optimization, which would explain >> why no one else seems to see this. Still, I think the underlying issue >> warrants investigation. > > I seem to recall that our gcc-4.2 with -O0 is known to be buggy -- certainly > I just tripped over a panic in a third-party kernel module build using > bsd.kmod.mk with -O0 that was fixed by compiling the object in question with > -O. > It is not terribly easy to search for, but my archives find at least > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-August/076028.html > > I would try with -O1 and confirm that your issues go away, and not spend time > on the core issue if it proves to be a gcc bug. > > Unfortunately, we are stuck with an old gcc in base ... though I have yet to > see if clang -O0 has issues with my module. Wow, I juxtaposed the two compilers due to working on too little sleep. Please disregard, and sorry for the noise. -BenReceived on Tue Jun 28 2011 - 03:42:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC