On Thursday 30 June 2011 18:59:04 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Mark Tinguely <marktinguely_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6/30/2011 4:22 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Trying to cross build ARM fails in the following way on 8-stable: > >> > >> 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 29 13:09:23 UTC 2011 > >> > >> make toolchain TARGET=arm > >> > >> Is this perhaps also an issue in 9-current? > >> > >> Any clues? > >> > >> cc -O -pipe -ffreestanding -Wformat -I/usr/src/lib/libstand > >> -msoft-float - > >> D_STANDALONE -DBZ_NO_STDIO -DBZ_NO_COMPRESS -DHAVE_MEMCPY - > >> I/usr/src/lib/libstand/../libz -std=gnu99 -c > >> /usr/src/lib/libstand/../libc/net/ntoh.c > >> {standard input}: Assembler messages: > >> {standard input}:27: Error: bad instruction `bswap r0' > >> {standard input}:53: Error: bad instruction `bswap r0' > > > > and you also said: > >> Tracing down the issue: > >> > >> /usr/include/machine/endian.h > >> > >> #define __byte_swap_int_var(x) \ > >> __extension__ ({ register __uint32_t __X = (x); \ > >> __asm ("bswap %0" : "+r" (__X)); \ > >> __X; }) > >> > >> r0 looks like an ARM register passed to a non-arm assembler. I'm going > >> to > > > >> try: > > Looks like you have an ARM compiler/assembler because the assembler > > rejects the i386/amd64 "bswap" assembly command. > > > > Does anyone remember if the cross compiler has the cross include paths > > compiled into them or should there be a "-I" in the compile command to > > correctly expand the "#include <machine/endian.h>" ? I thought the cross > > path was compiled into the cross compiler. > > > > You manually test the "cc" command with the included "-I" option. > > Adding -v to the command line might yield more interesting results in > tracking down the culprit header. > -Garrett I can add that: make toolchains succeeded. --HPSReceived on Thu Jun 30 2011 - 18:44:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:15 UTC