On 6 Mar 2011, at 16:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >>>> 2. Are you absolutely 100% sure the kernel you're using was built >>>> with "options UFS_ACL" defined in it? Doing a "strings -a >>>> /boot/kernel/kernel | grep UFS_ACL" should suffice. >>>> >>> >>> Yep, it does: >>> >>> % strings -a /boot/kernel/kernel | grep UFS_ACL >>> options UFS_ACL >>> >>> (My kernel config is just "include GENERIC" then a bunch of "nooptions" >>> for KDB, DDB, GDB, INVARIANTS, WITNESS, etc.) >> >> Cool, good to rule out the obvious. Thanks. >> >> The only other thing I can think of off the top of my head would be to >> "ktrace -t+ -i" the cp -p, then provide output of kdump -s -t+ after. >> I wouldn't say go about this quite yet (it may not even help determine >> what's going on); maybe wait for Robert to take a look first. > > It would help if I actually added Robert to the CC list, wouldn't it? > :-) There's a lot of information in that post, perhaps it would be useful for someone to clarify what's going on exactly. If you're using ACLs on UFS, have you turned them on using tunefs? What flavour of ACLs are you using -- POSIX.1e or NFSv4? RobertReceived on Sun Mar 06 2011 - 15:33:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC