Re: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD

> 
> On 7 March 2011 07:27, daren <daren.i_at_daelive.com> wrote:
>         
>         
>         On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 14:31 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>         > Hi all,
>         >
>         > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd
>         really
>         > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>         >
>         > I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and
>         found/fixed a few bugs
>         > in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced
>         regressions. I'd
>         > like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg)
>         support in
>         > weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I
>         haven't
>         > broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in
>         any way.
>         >
>         > Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the
>         results.
>         >
>         > I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n
>         support, but I
>         > need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy
>         operation in any way.
>         
>         
>         Do these changes support the AR2427?
> 
> 
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:07 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> The AR2427 support in HEAD is still unstable. I'm just fleshing out
> the AR9280 support and finding/fixing regressions that have been
> introduced before I continue fixing up the AR9285/AR2427 support.
> 
> 
> Basically, 11g modes on the AR2427 start off fine but they stop being
> successfully TXed after a few hours. Maybe if you run it in 11b only
> mode it'll be stable enough for use.
> 
> 
> I do have an AR2427 in a laptop here so I can actually test it. :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> adrian
> 

Ok great, thanks.