Re: FreeBSD Compiler Benchmark: gcc-base vs. gcc-ports vs. clang

From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach_at_mailplus.pl>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Vinícius Zavam wrote:
> 
> 
> i'm still curious about things like CPUTYPE= and -march= configured as
> native, gentlemen.
> is it the "golden egg" to use with our system or not? why "natives"
> aren't in the benchs?
> 
> /me feels confused.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Vinícius Zavam
> profiles.google.com/egypcio
> 

Apparently -march=native would equal -march=core2
with 65nm generation Core2s, this is not the case with
Penryns.. But there are none in the test? 

However, I agree that testing with -march=native
would be simpler and more straightforward.

regards, 
- Jakub Lach
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Compiler-Benchmark%3A-gcc-base-vs.-gcc-ports-vs.-clang-tp31119986p31138978.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Sun Mar 13 2011 - 18:19:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC