Nope. The AR9287 has a new EEPROM format, new calibration code and some extra tidbits here and there which I need to add. I've ordered a couple of them to add support - but I won't be doing so until I find/squish bugs relating to all the earlier chipsets. :) I'm not being evil - if there's bugs w/ the earlier chipsets, it's likely that shared code will also cause problems with later chipsets. This is why I've stopped at the AR9285. That said, if someone has an AR9287 and would like to get their hands dirty, and doesn't mind waiting a few weeks, I'd love to help you do the initial port. I can help you port the EEPROM code from ath9k and port over the calibration code. That's almost all of the easy work done. :) Adrian 2011/3/15 Gustau Pérez <gperez_at_entel.upc.edu> > Al 14/03/11 01:46, En/na Adrian Chadd ha escrit: > > Hi all, > > > > I've been working on AR9285 and AR2427 specific fixes. I seem to have > > fixed the issues I've seen with my AR9285 and AR2427 (and my AR2427 > > actually performs better under FreeBSD than Linux. Hah!) > > > > Just to be clear - the AR2427 support now seems to work and be stable. > > I'm seeing 24mbit in iperf TCP tests in both TX and RX test. > > > > Would people please give -head a test and report back to the list(s) ? > > > > > Will this also support AR9287 ? > > Regards and thanks for your work, > > Gustau >Received on Thu Mar 17 2011 - 06:42:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC