Re: bsdinstall-amd64-20110313 remarks

From: Lars Engels <lars.engels_at_0x20.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:04:28 +0100
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:25:36AM +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> yesterday I tested the images listed in the subject and have the following 
> remarks:
> 
> - At least the memstick image contains an empty fstab
> - Does the usage of a "dangerously dedikated disklabel" give any advantage?
> - The usage of an UFS-Label for root mounting should be more flexible
- UFS-labeling does not work

I let bsdinstall partition the disk automatically and edited the
proposed partitions to add labels, but after the first boot, neither
fstab nor /dev/label showed any labels.

Received on Mon Mar 21 2011 - 09:20:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:12 UTC