Hello, 2011/5/4 Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar_at_gmail.com>: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Olivier Smedts <olivier_at_gid0.org> wrote: >> em0: Using an MSI interrupt >> em0: Ethernet address: d4:85:64:b2:aa:f5 >> em0: Could not setup receive structures >> em0: Could not setup receive structures >> >> What can we do to help you debug this ? >> > At some point in time, in late February, I had the same issue on a > 6-interface machine. I tracked this down to the fact that the main > loop in em_setup_receive_ring() was not being entered. This resulted > in junk being returned as `error' is not explicitly initialized. At > the time, the following patch worked for me. Without it the driver was > unable to initialize with RX/TX ring's size of 512. With it, ring's > size of 1024 initialized fine. > > diff --git a/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c b/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c > index fb6ed67..f02059a 100644 > --- a/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c > +++ b/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c > _at__at_ -3901,7 +3901,7 _at__at_ em_setup_receive_ring(struct rx_ring *rxr) > struct adapter *adapter = rxr->adapter; > struct em_buffer *rxbuf; > bus_dma_segment_t seg[1]; > - int i, j, nsegs, error; > + int i, j, nsegs, error = 0; This patch made the trick for me. I'll post what Jack asked for in the following mail. > I did not dig much more at the time, but I was definitively seeing an > odd behavior. Anyhow, I am no longer able to reproduce this with > 7.2.3, so cannot dig in more details. > > Btw, I wish you all luck, it took me nearly two full months to > convince Jack (and other FreeBSD devs) that there was a bug in the > mbuf refresh code. > > - Arnaud > -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: olivier_at_gid0.org - against HTML email & vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."Received on Thu May 05 2011 - 10:18:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:13 UTC