on 29/05/2011 06:06 Attilio Rao said the following: > 2011/5/28 Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org>: >> 2011/5/25 Andriy Gapon <avg_at_freebsd.org>: >>> The patch is here: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/cpu-offline-sysctl.diff >>> It should implement the strategy described above. >>> >> >> I don't see the point in keeping alive mp_grab_cpu_hlt() and >> supporting, actually. >> >> On the top of your patch I made some modifies that use directly >> ap_watchdog() in cpu_idle() which I think is better for the time >> being: >> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/avg_rem_cpuhlt.diff Yes, I agree, thank you. >> If you are happy with it, just commit as long as Garrett tests that. OK. Waiting for test feedback. >> On a second round of changes we can discuss mp_watchdog and eventual >> removal / improvements to it. > > I almost forgot: this change would also require an UPDATE entry, where > you explicitly mention the "new" way to deal with CPUs. Use your > prefer wording. Sure. Thank you! BTW, I guess there would be no reason to MFC this change? -- Andriy GaponReceived on Tue May 31 2011 - 09:42:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:14 UTC