On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Penta Upa wrote: > Yes that seems to be the problem. It will is for out of tree modules. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161887 . I have to verify if > moving the module to /usr/src/ tree fixes the problem. > > Thanks, > Penta > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:04 AM, K. Macy <kmacy_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Someone was seeing the same issue with the vmtools kmod. The only >> thing that might make sense is that the page lock array is defined as >> being a different size in your kmod as in the kernel itself so the >> lock corresponding to the page you're locking differs between the two >> files. Quoting from the PR, Andriy Gapon <avg_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > A standalone module build doesn't get some important definitions from > kernel config (e.g. via opt_global.h) and can be in a serious > disagreement with the kernel. In particular, if a kernel is built with > SMP option, but a module build doesn't have SMP defined, then they will > have different definitions of PA_LOCK_COUNT and thus would work on > different actual locks when manipulating the same page. I am perhaps confused. Last I checked, bsd.kmod.mk caused '-include opt_global.h' to be passed on the command line. Is the issue just that the opt_global.h used for the kmod could be different from the actual kernel's opt_global.h, because KERNCONF was not specified and the header is generated at module-build time? In this case, clearly the onus is on the user to pass KERNCONF at module build time. (I have gotten my laptop to panic in vm_page_free() with the page lock not owned, in OpenAFS' vop_getpages implementation, but I had previously attributed this to having an old -current snapshot on my laptop and openafs sources that were using freebsd major version for API decisions (we're not converted to __FreeBSD_version, yet). If there is a real problem here, I will need to care much more.) Thanks, Ben KadukReceived on Wed Nov 02 2011 - 05:10:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:19 UTC