Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp

On Nov 3, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:

> El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió:
> 
>> No, it is not the same.  You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r
>> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them;
>> or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE
>> (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE).  Right now the
>> masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with
>> the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may fail
>> despite the fix.  But of course if you help to test without
>> masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner.
> 
> Well, I will try to help.
> 
> I have set WITH_FBSD10_FIX in /etc/make.conf; the port
> ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp installs:
> 
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h
> 
> with:
> 
> ...
> /* define the system type include file here */
> #define NETSNMP_SYSTEM_INCLUDE_FILE "net-snmp/system/freebsd10.h"
> ...
> 
> but the named header file is not there:
> 
> # ls -C1 /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/free*
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd.h
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd2.h
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd3.h
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd4.h
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd5.h
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd6.h
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd7.h
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd8.h
> /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd9.h
> 
> I don't know what the correct fix ist, and for the moment I
> created 'freebsd10.h' as a copy of 'freebsd9.h':
> 
> # cat freebsd10.h
> #include "freebsd9.h"
> #define freebsd8 freebsd8
> 
> +Cc: maintainer

You'll need to do more than just that. Take a look at the port history for more details...
-Garrett