On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:07 PM, "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au> wrote: > >> >> On 09/11/2011, at 17:32, Garrett Cooper wrote >>>> dd's of large files (spooled backups going to tape) to /dev/null are as slow as Samba. >>> >>> - Dedupe? >> >> Nope. >> >>> - Compression? >> >> On the mail spool & ports, but not on the tape spool. >> >>> - How much RAM? >> >> 8GB. >>> - What debug options do you have enabled in the kernel? >> >> It is 8.2-GENERIC so.. no WITNESS (for example) > > Ok. 8.2 release or stable? > >>> I've been noticing a slowdown in some respects with NFS/SMB, but I >>> suspected it was because I have an re(4) based NIC. ZFS has also wired >>> down a lot of my system memory for the L2ARC… >> >> >> re isn't great but I wouldn't expect it to slow down over time.. Unless bounce buffers got used more and more or something. >> >> I have an em0 card in this system - but in any case it is slow locally (i.e. dd a large file with 64k block size). > > Good point. Simple base cases help isolate the root cause. That > being said, my disk speed(s) are a lot better than my network + samba > speeds (zfs:store is mfid0 backed with write cache enabled; zfs:sac is > a single ada(4) backed disk with write cache enabled -- err... it > shouldn't be like that), but I suspect that's misconfiguration on my > part: > > $ sysctl hw.model hw.physmem > hw.model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU W3520 _at_ 2.67GHz > hw.physmem: 12863094784 > $ sudo mfiutil show volumes > mfi0 Volumes: > Id Size Level Stripe State Cache Name > mfid0 ( 1860G) RAID-6 64k OPTIMAL Enabled <STORE> > $ zpool status > pool: sac > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > sac ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada0p3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > pool: store > state: ONLINE > scan: scrub repaired 0 in 10h9m with 0 errors on Mon Nov 7 18:58:01 2011 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > store ONLINE 0 0 0 > mfid0p1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > $ zfs list -o name,mountpoint,atime,sync,compression,dedup > NAME MOUNTPOINT ATIME SYNC > COMPRESS DEDUP > sac legacy on standard > off off > sac/root / on standard > off off > sac/scratch /scratch on standard > off off > sac/scratch/freenas /scratch/freenas off standard > on off > sac/scratch/freenas/FreeBSD /scratch/freenas/FreeBSD off standard > on off > sac/usr /usr on standard > off off > sac/var /var on standard > off off > store /store on standard > off off > store/freebsd /store/freebsd on standard > on on > store/home /usr/home on standard > off off > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1m count=1024 > 1024+0 records out > 1073741824 bytes transferred in 13.426620 secs (79971119 bytes/sec) > $ cd /store > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1m count=1024 > 1024+0 records in > 1024+0 records out > 1073741824 bytes transferred in 7.565117 secs (141933276 bytes/sec) > $ cat /usr/local/etc/smb.conf > [global] > workgroup = WORKGROUP > server string = BAYONETTA > security = user > load printers = no > max log size = 50 > preferred master = yes > local master = yes > socket options = SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384 > nt acl support = yes > inherit acls = yes > map acl inherit = yes > aio read size = 16384 > aio write size = 16384 > > [scratch] > path = /scratch > writeable = yes > > [store] > path = /store > writeable = yes > $ > > I'll have to: > 1. Recheck what Windows 7 says when transferring out to my box > with a large file. > 2. Use nc to quickly measure network performance. > 3. Try transferring over NFS with both my Macbook and setup > FreeBSD or Linux on the other workstation for testing out NFS > transfers (64kB rsize/wsize of course). Wash, rinse, repeat with > samba. > The last I remember the transfer speeds were pitiful with samba36 > (somewhere around 45MBps to my 'store' zpool). I've been conservative > with the socket settings, but it might be time to bump that up along > with the mbuf cluster count (for some odd reason I haven't changed it > from the system default), reboot, and retest. > Thanks, > -Garrett > I have found the source of my speed issues, and they are not tied to samba or zfs. The replacement drive that I put into my array (just after I updated to stable/9 a few weeks ago) is hitting 100% busy in gstat while only writing out1-3MB/s -- it's a WDC WD15EARS-00Z5B1 and some quick googling has demonstrated that there are issues with drives like it.Received on Wed Nov 09 2011 - 22:12:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:20 UTC