Re: Stop scheduler on panic

on 13/11/2011 10:32 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> I was tricked into finishing the work by Andrey Gapon, who developed the
> patch to reliably stop other processors on panic.  The patch greatly
> improves the chances of getting dump on panic on SMP host. Several people
> already saw the patchset, and I remember that Andrey posted it to some
> lists.
> 
> The change stops other (*) processors early upon the panic.  This way, no
> parallel manipulation of the kernel memory is performed by CPUs. In
> particular, the kernel memory map is static.  Patch prevents the panic
> thread from blocking and switching out.
> 
> * - in the context of the description, other means not current.
> 
> Since other threads are not run anymore, lock owner cannot release a lock
> which is required by panic thread.  Due to this, we need to fake a lock
> acquisition after the panic, which adds minimal overhead to the locking
> cost. The patch tries to not add any overhead on the fast path of the lock
> acquire.  The check for the after-panic condition was reduced to single
> memory access, done only when the quick cas lock attempt failed, and braced
> with __unlikely compiler hint.
> 
> For now, the new mode of operation is disabled by default, since some 
> further USB changes are needed to make USB keyboard usable in that 
> environment.
> 
> With the patch, getting a dump from the machine without debugger compiled
> in is much more realistic.  Please comment, I will commit the change in 2
> weeks unless strong reasons not to are given.
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/stop_cpus_on_panic.1.patch
> 


On a more serious note:
- some code in my latest version of the patch was contributed by or was based
on the code or ideas contributed by jhb and mdf (so that attributions are not
lost)
- there was a concern about how sync-on-panic would work

About the latter, I have never really tested it.  mdf has suggested to move
the sync-on-panic code to a place after we ensure that there is only one CPU
in panic(), but before we stop other CPUs.

I think that I've already sent you a list of the early testers for various WIP
versions of the patch.

And thanks a lot again.
-- 
Andriy Gapon